Every posting in the live market is matched against your profile, scored 0–100, and shown only when it clears your bar. No keyword spam — each match earns its place.
This role is a near-perfect function match: your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and ACA expertise maps directly to every core responsibility listed, and the AGC title aligns with your stated target titles and senior manager-to-director seniority band. The remote, US-based position and healthcare/digital health industry also align with your location preferences and target industries.
Your ERISA/employee-benefits specialization and in-house experience at multiemployer funds and a Fortune 500 insurer align tightly with this product counsel role at a 401(k) fintech; the role asks for 5–8 years of ERISA-focused experience and your ~4 years puts you at the low end of the range, which is the main gap, but the substantive match on fiduciary duty, qualified plan compliance, and EPCRS is direct.
Your in-house legal background with M&A due diligence experience and healthcare regulatory expertise aligns well with a Sr. Corporate Counsel role at a healthcare company like Privia Health, and the fully remote US position matches your location preferences; the limited job description prevents deeper scoring but the function, seniority, and industry are strong fits.
Your ERISA, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance background aligns with the legal/regulatory function, and the remote-US setup matches your location preferences, but this role is focused on health technology regulatory (telehealth, CPOM, behavioral health clinical practice) rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits expertise—a meaningful functional gap that limits fit despite shared healthcare industry context.
The Associate General Counsel title is an exact match to your target titles, and the nonprofit/insurance trade association industry aligns with your target industries; however, the lack of a job description prevents confirmation of ERISA/benefits focus, and the Indianapolis-based remote role is geographically outside your stated metro preferences (DC/MD/VA/NY), though you accept US remote.
This role is a strong functional match—your ERISA, HIPAA, ACA, and health & welfare benefits compliance expertise aligns almost perfectly with the job's core requirements—but the posting asks for 8+ years of benefits compliance experience and is titled Associate Director, while your background reflects approximately four years of in-house experience at the senior associate/counsel level, creating a meaningful seniority gap that limits fit.
Your ERISA, HIPAA, and employee benefits compliance expertise maps directly to the core regulatory frameworks this role requires, and your in-house experience advising on plan governance and product compliance aligns well with the GRC build-out mandate; however, the role asks for 7+ years and a demonstrated track record of building compliance programs from scratch in a high-growth startup environment, which slightly exceeds your ~4 years of in-house experience and corporate-employer background.
This role targets equity compensation and securities law—corporate/capital markets work that diverges from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA specialization; while both touch 'benefits' broadly, your background is plan governance and labor relations rather than equity plan design, LLC agreements, or SEC filings, making the function match partial at best. The seniority range (4–8 years, Counsel-level) and fully remote setup align reasonably well with your profile, but the core subject-matter gap is a significant obstacle.
The role is a legal counsel position in a regulated healthcare/life sciences environment, which aligns with your legal function target and healthcare industry interest, but the substantive focus is on commercial contracts, supply chain logistics, pharma regulatory, and anti-corruption law—not ERISA, employee benefits, or HIPAA compliance, which are your core competencies; the 'Associate' title also sits below your target seniority band of Senior Manager to Senior Director.
The legal function and fintech/financial-services industry align with your targets, and the role is fully remote-US, but it requires 8+ years of banking law and OCC/Regulation W/Bank Holding Company Act expertise that your ~4 years of ERISA/employee-benefits/HIPAA experience does not cover; the seniority and compensation ($208K–$288K) also skew well above your current senior-associate/counsel level.
The role matches your in-house senior counsel level in financial services and your Virginia/remote location preferences, but your core expertise is ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA rather than travel industry, consumer financial regulatory, or fintech product law, which are the preferred qualifications here.
The role matches your in-house senior counsel seniority band and legal function at a financial services firm with a Virginia/hybrid location, but the substantive focus is travel product, consumer financial regulation, and fintech—not ERISA, employee benefits, or HIPAA, which are your core practice areas and the basis of your candidacy.
Your ERISA and employee benefits expertise aligns with the ERISA stretch component of this role, and your fintech/financial-services industry target matches Human Interest well, but this role is primarily a senior employment litigation and counseling position requiring 8-10+ years of dedicated employment law experience and deep California employment law expertise—areas that are secondary or absent in your background rather than your ERISA/benefits specialization.
Your ERISA/employee benefits legal background doesn't align with the structured finance and capital markets transactional focus this role requires — the job demands 5+ years in securitizations, ABS structures, and debt finance, which is a fundamentally different legal practice area from your healthcare compliance and pension fund expertise. The fintech industry and remote location match well, but the core function mismatch is disqualifying.
The role is a commercial/technology contracts counsel position at a fintech, which only partially overlaps with your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA specialization; the fintech industry and remote-US location are strong matches, but the core work (SaaS agreements, vendor contracts, TPRM) diverges significantly from your demonstrated legal function.
Your ERISA/employee benefits and healthcare compliance background diverges significantly from the commercial transactional focus required here (payments partnerships, bank/fintech deal negotiation), and you lack the 5+ years of commercial contracting experience with fintechs and payment networks that Coinbase explicitly requires; the fintech industry and remote-US location align, but the core function is a mismatch.
The role is in-house senior counsel at a financial services firm in McLean, VA—matching your target location, seniority band, and industry—but the subject matter (travel product, consumer financial regulatory, marketing/advertising law) diverges significantly from your core expertise in ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and multiemployer fund governance, making a substantive skills match weak despite the title and level alignment.
The role matches your in-house legal function, seniority band (Senior Manager/Senior Counsel), financial services industry target, and Virginia/hybrid location — but your core expertise is ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA, while this role requires travel industry, consumer financial regulatory, and fintech law experience, which is a meaningful functional mismatch.
Your ERISA/multiemployer fund background and in-house benefits counsel experience align directly with this role's focus on withdrawal liability, fund audits, and ERISA compliance, though this is a law-firm associate/of counsel position rather than the in-house director-level role you're targeting, which slightly undershoots your seniority trajectory. The NY location matches your geography, and the stated salary range of $208K–$279K for NYC is competitive for your level.
Your ERISA and employee benefits expertise aligns with Human Interest's retirement-focused fintech business, but this role centers on commercial contracting (SaaS, B2B agreements, CLM) rather than the benefits law, HIPAA compliance, and litigation work that defines your background—commercial counsel is a distinct function from your target of senior benefits/ERISA counsel or compliance director.
This commercial contracts role at a fintech aligns with your target industry and remote-US preference, but your core expertise is ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA—not commercial drafting and negotiation of revenue-generating agreements, which is the central requirement here; the 5+ years of complex commercial contracting experience is also a gap relative to your ~4 years focused on benefits/labor law.
The Director & Counsel title in financial services aligns directly with your target titles (Director, Legal & Compliance; Associate General Counsel) and your senior manager–to–director seniority band; American Express's insurance operations map well to your ERISA, employee benefits, and insurance-sector background, and New York is within your accepted locations.
The title aligns with your senior counsel target and legal function, but the role focuses on pharmaceutical market access and pricing law rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization, and the location is listed as Oregon remote rather than your preferred DC/MD/VA/NY markets or a clear US-remote posting.
Your in-house legal background and JD/MBA credentials align with a counsel-level financial services role, but the focus here is fintech partnership/banking law rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA expertise, and AVP typically sits below your senior manager–director seniority target.
This investment advisory legal counsel role at a major asset manager in Owings Mills, MD aligns well with your target function (in-house legal), location (Maryland/DC Metro), industry (financial services), and seniority band, but your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization doesn't map closely to the core need here—negotiating investment management agreements and Investment Advisers Act work for institutional asset management clients, which is a distinct practice area from your background.
The role is a strong function and location match — Senior Legal Counsel in Maryland within financial services aligns with your target titles, location (Owings Mills, MD is in the Baltimore/DC metro), and industry. However, the role requires 8+ years of experience focused on private funds, alternative investments, CLOs, and SEC/Investment Advisers Act frameworks, which is materially different from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA specialization; your in-house benefits counsel background does not map to private fund documentation and adviser regulatory work.
Your ERISA/employee benefits background is domestic-focused, while this role demands international employment law and EOR/global mobility expertise across multiple jurisdictions; additionally, the position is Remote - International (non-US), which falls outside your stated location preferences of US-based markets.
This is an international fintech payments/banking regulatory counsel role requiring 5+ years of multi-jurisdictional financial services law (UK, Ireland, Canada, Australia), which is a different legal specialty from your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance background; while the fintech industry and remote-US location align with your targets, you lack the required international payments and banking regulatory experience that is core to this role.
This is a commercial/technology transactions counsel role at a SaaS company, while your background is specialized in ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and multiemployer fund litigation—a substantially different legal function that misaligns with the SaaS contracting, FAR/DFARS, and FedRAMP focus required here. The seniority range ($115K–$162K, Counsel level) is somewhat below your director-level target, and while technology is in your target industries, you lack the commercial contracting and public sector procurement experience central to this role.
Your ERISA/employee benefits and healthcare compliance background is substantive in-house legal experience, but this role focuses on product counsel for AI, data privacy, and financial technology product development—a meaningfully different function from your core specialization; the 6+ year requirement in technology/product law and the cloud/API product focus are areas where your background doesn't align well despite the fintech industry match.
Your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA legal background is substantively misaligned with this role's core requirements—complex B2B SaaS, loan sale, and capital markets transactional work in a fintech lending context—and the 7-10+ years of transactional/commercial law firm experience required exceeds your approximately four years of in-house experience; the fintech industry and remote-US location are target matches, but the function mismatch is significant.
This role is in legal/data-licensing at a fintech, which matches your target function and industry, but the core requirement is 8+ years negotiating financial data/content licensing agreements at a broker-dealer or financial data provider—a highly specialized commercial transactional niche far removed from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA expertise.
Your ERISA/employee benefits legal background and in-house counsel experience align well with the seniority level and financial services industry, but this role requires substantive prudential bank regulation expertise (BHC Act, National Bank Act, Dodd-Frank safety-and-soundness) that is outside your core ERISA/healthcare compliance specialty, making it a weak functional match despite the title and location alignment.
This Associate General Counsel role in McLean, VA directly matches your target title and DC Metro location preference, and your ERISA/benefits/HIPAA in-house background translates well to the compliance, employment, and privacy scope here—though the role skews toward commercial contracting and M&A integration rather than your core employee benefits specialization.
The role is in legal/fintech, matching your target function and industry, but requires 10+ years focused on mortgage/HELOC and consumer lending regulations (TILA, RESPA, HMDA) — your background is ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA, with no evident mortgage or real estate lending expertise. Additionally, the seniority level (Assistant General Counsel, $239K–$331K) is above your current senior associate/counsel positioning.
Your ERISA/employee benefits and healthcare compliance background is a poor match for this securities class action and shareholder derivative litigation role, which requires deep Securities Act/Exchange Act and Delaware Chancery Court experience you don't appear to have; the seniority level (7+ years complex civil litigation) also skews above your current positioning.
The role is a strong seniority and location match (McLean/Richmond/NY, hybrid, financial services), but it requires substantive federal prudential bank regulation expertise (Bank Holding Company Act, Dodd-Frank safety-and-soundness), whereas your background is concentrated in ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and employment law—a meaningfully different legal specialty that would make you a weak substantive fit despite the shared in-house counsel level and financial services industry.
The Corporate Counsel title and 3+ year requirement align with your legal function and seniority band, and Washington D.C. is within your target geography, but this role centers on commercial contracts, AI/data privacy, and energy/tech regulatory matters—far from your core ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA specialization—making it a functional mismatch despite the title fit.
This is a privacy/data-protection counsel role at WEX (fintech), while your background is ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA—your HIPAA and healthcare compliance experience is relevant but the core focus on global privacy law, AI regulation, and cybersecurity falls outside your primary specialty, and the 2-4 years PQE target skews slightly junior relative to your senior manager/director band.
Your in-house legal background and JD/MBA credentials fit the legal function and fintech industry target, but this role requires minimum 6 years of relevant experience with specific fluency in crypto/digital assets, securities/derivatives law, payments regulation (Reg Z, Reg E, money transmitter licensing), and broker-dealer frameworks—none of which appear in your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization; the function matches but the subject-matter expertise is a significant gap.
This role targets product compliance in fintech (BNPL/consumer lending regulations like TILA, FCRA, UDAAP) with 8+ years required, while your background centers on ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA — a different compliance domain — and your ~4 years of experience falls well short of the 8-year minimum for this director-level role.
This role centers on commercial litigation, data privacy disputes, and CCPA/GDPR exposure at a B2B SaaS company, while your background is concentrated in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA compliance — the function overlaps only on the employment-dispute component, and the tech/data-privacy core is outside your demonstrated expertise. The seniority is a reasonable match (senior counsel level), but the gap between your benefits/regulatory specialty and the litigation-infrastructure ownership this role demands is a significant mismatch.
Your legal function and fintech/financial services background align directionally, but this role requires 8+ years of transactional/vendor contracting experience (SaaS, cloud, technology agreements) and 2+ years of people management — your ~4 years of experience is concentrated in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA litigation/compliance rather than commercial transactional work, making this a significant functional mismatch despite the industry overlap.
While you hold a JD and in-house legal experience in financial services and fintech is a target industry, this role requires 5+ years of deep crypto/securities law expertise (Securities Act, Exchange Act, Investment Advisers Act, crypto/blockchain product counseling) that your background in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA does not cover—a fundamental function mismatch that overrides the location and industry alignment.
The role is in financial services legal in your target DC-metro geography, but the core function is third-party procurement/outsourcing contract work rather than your ERISA, employee benefits, or healthcare regulatory specialization—your M&A due diligence experience is relevant but secondary to what this role demands.
This is a procurement/vendor transactions counsel role at Capital One (financial services, Virginia/hybrid), which matches your target industry and location, but your specialization is ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance—not third-party procurement or outsourcing contracts, which is the core function here; your M&A due diligence exposure is adjacent but insufficient to offset the mismatch in primary legal function.
This role is in financial services (Capital One) in the DC/Virginia metro, matching your location and industry targets, but the function is procurement/vendor/outsourcing transactions counsel — not employee benefits, ERISA, HIPAA, or healthcare regulatory work, which is where your four years of in-house specialization sits; your M&A due diligence experience is a partial signal but not a substitute for the required third-party procurement focus.
The seniority level (Sr. Manager/Sr. Counsel) and financial services industry align well with your target, and McLean VA is in your geography, but this role requires substantive prudential bank regulation expertise (BHC Act, National Bank Act, Dodd-Frank safety-and-soundness) that is distinct from your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialty—your legal background is in employee benefits and healthcare compliance, not federal financial regulatory law.
The role is a strong seniority and location fit (McLean, VA aligns with your DC Metro preference), but your specialization in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA diverges significantly from the prudential bank regulation focus (Bank Holding Company Act, Dodd-Frank safety-and-soundness) this position requires—six-plus years of federal financial services regulatory experience is the preferred qualifier, which your background does not directly address.
The title and seniority align well with your senior counsel/director target band at a financial services firm, but the role requires 5+ years specializing in privacy, AI, and data protection law—your background is in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA compliance, which is a meaningful functional mismatch from the privacy/data-analytics product counsel focus here.
Your ERISA/employee benefits and healthcare compliance background doesn't align with this role's core requirement of multifamily agency finance (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac/FHA-HUD) and commercial real estate lending expertise—a fundamentally different legal specialty despite matching seniority level and DC-metro/NY location.
The role matches your seniority band (Senior Manager/Senior Counsel) at a financial services company in the DC/Virginia metro, but the required specialty is multifamily agency finance (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac/HUD transactions and commercial real estate lending), which is entirely outside your ERISA, employee benefits, and healthcare regulatory background.
While you match on seniority band (Senior Manager/Senior Counsel), financial services industry, and DC/VA location, the role requires specialized commercial real estate and multifamily agency finance (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac/FHA) transactional expertise that is entirely absent from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA-focused background.
This Director-level employment law investigations and counseling role at Prudential matches your in-house legal background, financial services/insurance industry target, and seniority band, and the virtual office options cover your DC/MD/VA geography; however, the role centers on employment law investigations (Title VII, ADA, FMLA, FLSA) rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits specialization, which is a meaningful function mismatch.
This Senior Counsel role at Empower aligns well with your target title, financial services industry, and remote US preference, but the core function is commercial contracts (drafting/negotiating client and vendor agreements) rather than your deep ERISA/employee benefits compliance and plan governance expertise — though the role does touch retirement plan services and multiemployer plans, which partially maps to your background. Your ~4 years of in-house experience approaches but may fall slightly short of the 5+ year contracts drafting emphasis required.
This is an in-house counsel role at a major financial services firm in Virginia (hybrid), matching your location and industry targets, but the function centers on consumer credit card complaints, disputes, and fraud law rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA expertise, which substantially limits the fit despite the legal function overlap.
This is a vendor/commercial transactional role requiring 5+ years of technology contracting, SaaS/cloud agreements, and data privacy frameworks (CCPA, GDPR) — your background is deeply in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA compliance, with no evident transactional commercial contracting experience, making the function a poor match despite fintech industry alignment and remote location.
Your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA background aligns closely with this role's core requirements, and your in-house experience at multiemployer funds is directly relevant; however, this is a law-firm associate position (client-facing billable work) whereas your trajectory and target titles point toward in-house senior counsel or director-level roles, making it a partial seniority/setting mismatch.
Your ERISA, employee benefits, and litigation background directly maps to this fintech litigation/regulatory counsel role, and Betterment explicitly lists ERISA knowledge as a bonus qualification; however, the role is NYC hybrid (4 days/week in-office) while your preferred locations are DC-metro/remote, which is a meaningful friction point at this in-office intensity.
Your ERISA and in-house litigation background directly matches the role's litigation/regulatory focus and the bonus-point preference for ERISA/financial-services knowledge, but the position is NYC hybrid (4 days/week in-office) while your preferred locations are DC Metro/Maryland/Virginia/Remote, which is a meaningful mismatch.
The Director of Legal title at Korn Ferry aligns with your target seniority band and legal function, and professional services is within your target industries; however, the lack of description makes it impossible to confirm ERISA/employee benefits specialization, which is your core differentiator, and New York is a secondary location preference for you.
The Director & Counsel title at a major financial services firm aligns with your target seniority band and legal function, and American Express matches your financial_services target industry; however, the 'Enterprise Strategic Portfolio & Transactions' focus suggests M&A/corporate transactions work rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits specialization, and New York is within your acceptable locations but not your primary market.
The role is in legal/counsel function at a major financial services firm, aligning with your target function and industry, but the specialization is Fair Banking/CRA/HMDA rather than ERISA/employee benefits, and the position is explicitly not remote with in-office expectations in Atlanta, Charlotte, Richmond, or McLean — only McLean/DC is within your preferred geography.
Your in-house legal background, ERISA/HIPAA compliance expertise, and M&A due diligence experience show relevant regulated-industry counsel skills, but this role is squarely focused on U.S. banking regulations, UDAAP, payments, and fintech product counseling—areas outside your core benefits/ERISA specialization—which significantly limits functional alignment.
This Senior Counsel role at Capital One requires at least 2 years of multifamily agency finance (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac/FHA) transactional experience, which is a specialized CRE finance niche far outside your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA legal background; the function and level align, but your subject-matter expertise does not match the core requirement.
Your in-house legal background and M&A due diligence experience are relevant, but this role centers on SaaS/technology commercial contracting and AI product counsel—not ERISA, employee benefits, or healthcare compliance—so your core specialty doesn't align; additionally, the associate-level title and seniority sit below your target senior manager/director band.
Your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA background is specialized rather than the corporate governance and digital-asset regulatory expertise this role centers on, and your experience has no crypto or blockchain component—the core requirement here—though your JD, in-house counsel experience, and fintech target industry partially align.
The Senior Legal Counsel role at Danaher/Beckman Coulter aligns with your target function (in-house legal counsel) and target seniority band, and the healthcare/life sciences industry matches your target industries; however, the focus is on commercial agreements and life sciences regulatory law rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization, and the listed locations (Austin, Indianapolis, Loveland, San Jose) are mostly outside your preferred DC/MD/VA/NY metro footprint, with only the New York location offering a geographic match.
This is a financial-services in-house counsel role in McLean, VA (within your DC Metro target area), but it focuses on credit card complaints, billing disputes, and consumer fraud rather than your core ERISA/employee-benefits/HIPAA expertise, creating a significant function mismatch; the 'Manager, Counsel' title also sits somewhat below your senior-director seniority target.
This role is estate planning law in a wealth management context, while your specialization is ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance — meaningfully different legal functions; additionally, the 2-6 years experience range and $90-110K base salary targets a junior-to-mid level attorney, which is below your senior manager/director seniority band.
This Senior Counsel role at a Fortune 100 financial services firm matches your seniority band and target industry, but the function centers on commercial contracting and payments network law (Pulse/Discover debit, Durbin/Reg. II, ATM products), which is materially different from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA specialization—your legal expertise would not translate directly to payment card regulatory and commercial contracting work.
This compliance advisory director role at a financial services firm aligns with your target industry and DC-metro location (McLean, VA), and your JD plus in-house compliance experience is a credential match; however, your core expertise is ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA rather than consumer lending/personal loans compliance (CRCM, UDAAP, Reg Z context), which is a meaningful functional mismatch for a role requiring subject-matter depth in banking products.
This Director, Compliance role requires 8+ years in lending compliance (RESPA, TILA, ECOA, HMDA, HELOC origination/servicing) at a fintech, which is a distinct compliance subspecialty from your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA background; while your seniority band and fintech industry target align, your regulatory expertise does not meaningfully overlap with consumer lending compliance.
Your ERISA, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance background aligns well with Mastercard's healthcare vertical focus, and the Senior Counsel title fits your target, but the role requires 7+ years total and 3+ years specifically in pharma/biotech/healthcare industry or supporting law firm work—your ~4 years of in-house experience and benefits/ERISA focus is adjacent but may fall short of the transactional commercial payments law emphasis Mastercard needs.
This role targets broker-dealer securities compliance (FINRA Series 7/24, SEC/OCC jurisdiction) requiring 10+ years, whereas your background is in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA—distinct legal domains with minimal overlap in securities regulation; the director title and remote-US setup fit your seniority and location preferences, but the specialized fintech/broker-dealer compliance function is misaligned with your core expertise.
The Director-level legal counsel role at BlackRock in financial services aligns with your target seniority band and industry, but the digital assets focus is a significant functional mismatch given your specialization in ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance rather than crypto/blockchain legal work; New York is within your accepted locations.
Your ERISA, employee benefits, and employment law background aligns well with the core function, and the DC location matches your targets, but the role requires 12+ years of employment law counseling experience and is titled Associate General Counsel—a level above your current ~4 years in-house, making the seniority a significant gap that would likely disqualify you.
This role is in-house counsel at a financial services firm in McLean/Richmond VA, which matches your location and industry targets, but the function centers on third-party procurement, vendor contracts, and outsourcing transactions—not ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, or healthcare regulatory work that defines your expertise; your M&A due diligence experience is adjacent but the core procurement/supplier focus is a significant mismatch with your specialization.
This role is a strong seniority and industry match (Senior Manager/Senior Counsel at a Fortune 100 financial services firm in McLean/NY, both in your target locations), but the function centers on commercial contracting, payment network deals, and fintech/Latin America transactions—far from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA specialization, which is the core of your legal expertise.
Your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA legal background does not align with the SaaS commercial contracting and privacy focus this role requires (3+ years B2B SaaS experience is a hard requirement); while you are positioned at the right seniority band and the remote-US location matches, the core function mismatch between benefits/employment law and commercial transactional SaaS counsel is too significant to overcome.
This is a financial-services in-house counsel role in McLean, VA (your target metro) at the right seniority band, but the function centers on consumer financial marketing law (UDAAP, Reg Z, advertising), whereas your background is concentrated in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA — minimal overlap with the core preferred qualifications here.
The role is in-house legal counsel at a financial services firm (matching your target industry and legal function), but focuses on consumer credit card complaints, billing disputes, and fraud—areas outside your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA expertise, and the Manager-level title sits slightly below your senior manager-to-director seniority band target.
Your ERISA and in-house litigation background directly matches the role's fintech/financial-services focus and the explicit bonus-point callout for ERISA knowledge, but the position skews toward securities/FINRA arbitration and general commercial litigation rather than your core employee-benefits compliance specialty, and the NYC hybrid (4 days/week in-office) requirement is a partial mismatch with your remote-preferred profile.
The Senior Legal Counsel title and technology industry align reasonably with your target functions and industries, but the Dublin, Ireland location is a disqualifying mismatch given your stated geography (Maryland, Virginia, DC Metro, NY Metro, or Remote-US only).
This Director-level corporate/capital markets role in fintech aligns with your seniority band and remote-US location preference, but your specialization in ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance is a poor functional match for capital markets, commercial transactions, and corporate governance—the core requirements here.
The function is a strong match—your ERISA, employee benefits, and multiemployer plan expertise aligns directly with this role's core work, but the seniority and compensation target ($360K-$380K law-firm associate scale) suggest a Big Law associate track rather than the in-house senior manager/director level you are targeting, and the role requires New York office presence while your locations center on the DC Metro area.
The role is in financial services at the right seniority level (Senior Manager/Senior Counsel) and is located in McLean, VA and New York, which align with your target locations, but the function centers on commercial contracting, payments network deals, and Latin America/Caribbean expansion—far from your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance specialization, making a substantive skills mismatch the key disqualifier.
Your ERISA/HIPAA/healthcare compliance background aligns with the legal function and fintech industry target, but this role requires 6+ years with substantial focus on privacy, data protection, and AI governance—not employee benefits or ERISA—and the on-site NYC/NJ/GA requirement conflicts with your DC Metro/remote preference.
Your ERISA/employee benefits and in-house employment law background aligns with the legal function, but this role requires multi-jurisdictional international employment law and EOR expertise—neither of which appears in your background—and the location requirement (CET overlap, EMEA/APAC/Portugal/Spain/India) does not match your US-based target locations.
The role is Director-level legal counsel at a financial services firm in your target DC/Virginia market, but the required specialty is ad tech, digital tracking, and data privacy (GLBA, CCPA) — not ERISA, employee benefits, or HIPAA compliance, which is your core expertise; your background lacks the privacy product counseling and ad tech experience the posting explicitly requires.
Your legal/compliance background is in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA — not consumer lending marketing compliance (UDAAP, Reg B, TCPA, CAN-SPAM), which is the core technical requirement here; the director-level scope and fintech/remote location fit, but the function mismatch between employee benefits law and consumer lending/marketing compliance is a fundamental gap.
Your ERISA/employee-benefits legal background is a poor match for this role's core requirement of 7+ years in consumer financial regulation (CFPB, TILA/Reg Z, UDAAP, fintech lending), which is a distinct legal specialty; the AGC title and seniority band align, but the substantive regulatory domain is outside your demonstrated expertise.
The AGC title and Washington DC location align well with your target titles and geography, but pharmaceuticals/R&D innovation legal is outside your ERISA/employee benefits/healthcare compliance specialization, making a substantive function mismatch likely.
This in-house counsel role at a major financial institution in McLean, VA aligns with your target location and legal function, but the subject matter (credit card complaints, billing disputes, consumer fraud) is a significant departure from your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization, and the Manager/Counsel title sits slightly below your senior director seniority target.
The Director/AGC title, financial services industry, and DC/NY/VA locations align with your targets, but this role requires 3+ years of privacy product counseling and deep ad tech/digital tracking expertise that your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA background does not substantially address — your legal specialization is fundamentally misaligned with the marketing platform and data privacy function required here.
Your in-house legal and compliance background in regulated industries aligns with the function, and fintech is a target industry, but this role centers on consumer financial data privacy (FCRA, CCPA, GDPR) and product counsel work rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits specialty—a meaningful functional mismatch. The NYC hybrid requirement (3 days/week in-office) is workable given your New York Metro location preference, and the seniority range fits senior counsel level.
This role targets payments/fintech regulatory counsel with 8+ years focused on money transmission, MTL licensing, and FX regulation — your background is in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA compliance, which is a fundamentally different legal specialty despite both being in-house regulatory work; the fintech industry aligns with your targets but the function mismatch is substantial.
Your ERISA/employee-benefits legal background and in-house counsel experience align on function and seniority, but this role requires Canadian bar admission and practice in Canadian financial services regulation (OSFI, FCAC), which you do not have; the role is also Canada-only with no US-remote option.
The role is in financial services compliance at the Senior Manager level in McLean, VA or NY, which matches your seniority band, location preferences, and target industry, but the function centers on network/payments/cybersecurity compliance rather than your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, or healthcare regulatory expertise—your legal background doesn't map well to the payments network and merchant risk management focus required here.
The role is general commercial/IP litigation counsel at a tech company, while your background centers on ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA compliance — the employment-litigation overlap is partial but the core commercial and IP litigation duties are outside your demonstrated expertise; the Virginia location matches your target geography but the position explicitly states it is not remote.
The role matches your target function (Senior Counsel) and industry (financial services/fintech at Mastercard), but requires 7-10 years of US banking and payments regulatory experience — your ~4 years of ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA-focused practice is a functional mismatch, as this role demands payments law and federal banking regulation expertise rather than benefits law.
This AGC role focuses on commercial contracts, UCC, trademark/IP, and marketing law in an industrial distribution company — none of which align with your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, or healthcare regulatory specialization; the 10-year experience requirement also exceeds your ~4 years, and industrials is outside your target industries.
Your employment law and labor relations experience aligns with the core function, but your specialization is ERISA/employee benefits rather than general employment litigation, and this role skews toward a mid-level Corporate Counsel rather than your target Senior Counsel/Director band; the McLean, VA office location is a geographic positive.
Your in-house regulatory compliance and legal background aligns with the counsel-level function, but this role focuses on crypto/blockchain monitorships and financial crimes compliance rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits expertise, and the 'Global' location with no stated US-remote confirmation adds uncertainty for your DC/MD/VA/remote-US preference.
This role requires 10+ years leading BSA/AML/OFAC programs with deep financial crimes expertise (SAR, CIP, KYC, CDD, transaction monitoring), which is a distinct compliance specialty far removed from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA background; while your director-level seniority and fintech industry target align, the functional mismatch is fundamental and disqualifying.
Your legal background aligns with the function, but this role requires German language skills and is based in Germany (remote Germany), which falls outside your stated US-based locations; additionally, commercial tech contracts counsel diverges significantly from your ERISA/employee benefits specialization.
The legal & compliance function aligns well with your ERISA/benefits and compliance background, and professional services is a target industry; however, 'Head of' titles typically sit at VP/SVP level, which is above your current senior manager-to-senior director band, and the lack of description makes it impossible to confirm a benefits-specific scope.
Your ERISA/employee-benefits and employment law background overlaps with this employment legal director role, but the posting requires 10+ years PQE, litigation management across multiple jurisdictions, and team leadership at a Director level—well above your ~4 years of senior-associate/counsel experience; additionally, the role is hybrid in SF or NYC while your primary locations are DC Metro/MD/VA/Remote-US.
This Director/AGC role at Capital One targets commercial contracting and payment network law (merchant agreements, fintech, Discover Network rules), while your background centers on ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and multiemployer fund governance — a meaningfully different legal specialty that creates a low function match despite sharing the in-house corporate counsel track and financial services industry. The McLean, VA and New York locations align with your geography, and the seniority level is roughly right, but the 8+ year minimum and commercial contracting specialization are gaps you'd need to bridge.
The function (regulatory counsel/compliance in financial services) aligns with your legal background, and Mastercard is squarely in your target industry; however, this role requires deep payments regulation and money-transmitter licensing expertise you don't have, and at $250K–$400K NYC base it targets a VP/Managing Director level that exceeds your senior manager–senior director band.
Your ERISA/employee benefits legal background and in-house compliance experience align partially with this AGC role at Nasdaq, but the posting requires 8+ years of broad corporate compliance experience spanning anti-corruption, sanctions/export control, and technology regulation—areas outside your core ERISA/benefits specialization—and the seniority expectation (8+ years, reporting to CCO at a global fintech) exceeds your approximately four years of in-house experience.
Your legal background is in ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance — this role focuses on SaaS commercial contracting, data privacy, AI addendums, and enterprise software licensing, which is a meaningfully different legal function with little overlap to your specialty; the seniority is roughly comparable but the subject matter mismatch is the primary gap.
Your in-house employment law and ERISA background aligns well with American Express's financial services environment, but the 'Manager & Counsel' title likely sits at a mid-level manager band, which is below your target senior manager-to-director seniority range; the employment (not benefits) focus is also a partial mismatch.
Your ERISA/employee benefits legal background doesn't align with this role's requirement for institutional financial agreements (ISDA, prime brokerage, derivatives), and critically the position is Remote - UK only, which falls entirely outside your accepted US-based locations.
This role requires 6-8+ years of commercial real estate leasing and operational procurement contracting experience, which is entirely outside your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization; your in-house legal background and fintech industry target are partial matches, but the core subject matter (commercial leases, landlord/tenant law, facilities vendor contracts) does not align with your expertise.
Your ERISA/employee-benefits and healthcare compliance background is far from the SaaS/technology commercial contracting and IP-licensing transactional experience this role requires, and the 10+ years minimum experience with complex tech agreements exceeds your approximately four years of in-house legal experience, making both function and seniority a poor fit.
This Commercial Counsel role focuses on SaaS commercial contracting (MDSAs, DPAs, order forms, vendor agreements) requiring 7+ years of commercial transactions experience in a high-growth tech environment, which is a poor match for your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialty and ~4 years of in-house experience; the function is legal but the subject matter diverges sharply from your core practice areas.
This role is based in Australia (Melbourne/Sydney/Canberra/Brisbane) with no US remote option, which is a hard disqualifier given your location targets of DC Metro, Maryland, Virginia, New York Metro, or US-remote only. Additionally, the role focuses on APJ telecommunications regulatory compliance rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA expertise.
Your in-house legal experience and JD/MBA align with the Senior Counsel title and financial services industry, but this role requires minimum six years of technology, commercial transactions, and payments experience—your background is ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA-focused, not product counsel or transactional payments law, which is a significant functional mismatch. The Purchase, NY location partially overlaps with your New York Metro preference but is on-site, not remote.
The Director-Compliance title at American Express aligns with your target seniority band and financial services industry target, but without a job description there's no way to confirm whether the compliance function focuses on employee benefits/ERISA (your core expertise) versus general financial regulatory compliance, which is a meaningful functional gap risk.
The Director-Compliance title at American Express aligns with your target seniority band and financial services industry, but without a job description there's no way to confirm the function matches your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization versus general corporate compliance, which limits confidence; New York Metro is an accepted location.
While your JD/MBA credentials, in-house legal experience, and Director-level seniority target align well with this Capital One role, the position requires at least 3 years focused on data privacy product counseling and ad tech/digital tracking technologies — areas absent from your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and employment law background, making this a weak functional match despite the shared title level and Virginia/DC location.
This Director-level AGC role at Capital One targets ad tech, data privacy (GLBA, CCPA, digital tracking), and marketing platform counseling — your background is concentrated in ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA compliance, with no evident experience in privacy product counseling or ad tech, which are the stated core requirements (3+ years privacy product counseling preferred).
This is a California employment litigation motion-writing role requiring CA bar admission and California-specific litigation experience, neither of which aligns with your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA in-house compliance background or your target of senior counsel/AGC-level roles; your experience is transactional and regulatory rather than motion-practice litigation, and the CA bar requirement is a hard disqualifier.
The role is a legal/compliance attorney position in DC (matching your location and seniority band), but it centers on Code of Conduct investigations and ethics program management in the utilities sector—not your core ERISA/employee benefits/healthcare regulatory expertise, and utilities is outside your target industries.
The role is in-house legal at a financial services company in locations you target (McLean, VA; New York, NY), but the core function is commercial contracting and payment network law, which is far from your ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization; the seniority level (8-10+ years required) also exceeds your approximately four years of in-house experience.
The compliance advisor function and financial services industry align well with your background, and McLean/New York locations match your target geography, but the role requires 8-12+ years in compliance/risk with consumer protection regulatory experience (CFPB, OCC, FTC) and people management, whereas your ~4 years of in-house experience is centered on ERISA/employee benefits rather than consumer protection or retail/shopping compliance—a meaningful functional mismatch.
Your ERISA/employment law background covers regulatory compliance broadly, but this role requires CFTC derivatives and commodity exchange regulation expertise that is outside your demonstrated specialty; the fintech industry and New York location are compatible targets, but the substantive law mismatch is a significant gap.
This role sits at the intersection of AI governance, technology transactions, privacy, and cybersecurity — areas well outside your core ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA compliance expertise, and the job explicitly requires experience advising on AI, machine learning, or data governance, which is not evidenced in your background. While the legal industry and seniority band align and DC is a listed location, the functional mismatch is too substantial to rate this a strong fit.
This role requires real estate transactional expertise (leasing, land use, landlord-tenant disputes) which is entirely outside your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and employment law specialization; while you share the financial services industry and Virginia/DC Metro location, the substantive legal function mismatch is disqualifying.
This Counsel role at Nationwide (financial services/insurance) matches your target industry and seniority band, but the function is auto physical damage claims strategy — far from your ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance specialization, which is the core mismatch that limits fit.
This Director-level ads product counsel role requires 12-15+ years of practice with 7+ years specifically as in-house ads product counsel at a tech company—your ~4 years of in-house experience focused on ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA has essentially no overlap with digital advertising, ad tech ecosystems, GDPR/ePrivacy, or UGC platform law, making this a significant mismatch on both seniority and specialty. The location is remote-US which aligns, but the function and experience requirements are far outside your benefits/healthcare compliance background.
The Compliance Director title aligns with your target seniority band and legal/compliance function in fintech, but Chicago is outside your stated preferred locations (DC Metro, VA, MD, NY Metro, or Remote-US), and the lack of a job description makes it impossible to confirm ERISA/benefits specialty fit.
This Director-level legal compliance role at Mastercard (financial services) aligns with your target seniority band and industry, but the core specialty is global sanctions and export controls—a financial crimes domain quite distinct from your ERISA, employee benefits, and HIPAA expertise, creating a significant function mismatch despite the shared compliance framing.
The title and seniority band align well, and fintech is a target industry with full US remote accepted, but your deep ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA specialization doesn't match the generalist commercial contracts, IP, and product counseling focus Slice needs—and the role explicitly prefers BigLaw or top-firm background plus in-house tech experience you don't appear to have.
The title and seniority band align well with your target of Senior/Associate General Counsel, and the nonprofit industry and DC/NY locations match your preferences, but the role is at NRDC—an environmental advocacy organization—where the legal work centers on environmental law and litigation rather than your core specialization in ERISA, employee benefits, HIPAA, and healthcare compliance, making the function match weak despite the level and location fit.
The function (in-house employee benefits/ERISA legal counsel) and location (McLean, VA, within your DC Metro target) align well, but the role requires a minimum of 10 years of legal experience with deep federal tax law expertise (IRC 409A, 162(m), payroll tax) and commands a $231K–$347K salary band, placing it well above your approximately four years of experience and senior-associate seniority band—the tax specialization depth required also exceeds your ERISA/benefits compliance profile.
The financial services industry and AGC-level title align with your target industries and seniority band, but the role focuses on technology contracting and vendor agreements rather than your core ERISA/employee benefits/HIPAA expertise, making it a functional mismatch. The Reston location is within your DC Metro preference, but Glen Allen (Richmond, VA) is outside your primary markets.